Clinical outcomes in eyes with diffractive continuous depth-of-focus intraocular lenses enhanced for near vision: comparison with trifocal intraocular lenses.

BACKGROUND: To prospectively evaluate visual functions and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of diffractive continuous depth-of-focus intraocular lens (CDF IOL) compared with trifocal IOLs. METHODS: This investigator-initiated study was approved by a certified local review board (registered: jRCTs032210305). CDF IOL (Synergy, J&J, group S) and trifocal IOL (AcrySof PanOptix, Alcon, group P) were implanted bilaterally in 30 patients each. Three months postoperatively, binocular outcomes of uncorrected (BUCVA) and distance-corrected (BDCVA) visual acuities at distances of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, and 5 m were measured. Contrast sensitivities were binocularly measured using CSV-1000 (2.5 m) and Pelli-Robson charts at distances of 0.4 and 1 m. Symptoms of glare, halo, starburst, and waxy vision, and satisfaction for near, intermediate, and far visions were assessed with questionnaires. Differences between the two groups were examined. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients each completed the follow-up. The mean age of the group S was lower than that of the group P (P < 0.001). The BUCVA at 0.4 m was better in the S group, while the mean manifest refraction of the P group showed a significant hyperopic shift (P < 0.001). BDCVA was significantly better in the S group. The contrast sensitivity results at three distances showed no discernible differences. Although more patients in the S group reported significant glare and halo, their satisfaction with near vision was higher. CONCLUSIONS: The binocular visual function of patients with CDF IOLs was comparable to or better than that of patients with trifocal IOLs. The patients were satisfied with near vision, despite the enhanced glare and halo. Understanding the differences between the two types of presbyopia-correcting IOLs is important to ensure patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Research (identifier: jRCTs032210305) on September 13, 2021.

Visual Function after Implantation of Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the visual functions of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) and monofocal IOLs in eyes with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Cataractous eyes with POAG controlled using medical treatments, no central visual field defects, and mean deviation (MD) values of -10 dB or better on the 30-2 test grid of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard program were included. Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients received EDOF IOLs (ZXR00V and ZXV150-375; J&J), whereas 24 eyes of 24 patients received monofocal IOLs (ZCB00V and ZCV150-375; J&J). MD values, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and photopic contrast sensitivity were measured at 3 months after surgery. Noninferiority of CDVA and contrast sensitivity in eyes with EDOF IOLs to eyes with monofocal IOLs were examined. RESULTS: The postoperative mean MDs of eyes with EDOF and monofocal IOLs were -2.76 dB and -4.21 dB with no significant difference. The CDVA of eyes with EDOF IOLs was noninferior to that of eyes with monofocal IOLs (P = 0.02). There were no inferiority in contrast sensitivity at any spatial frequency (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The visual function of EDOF IOLs in eyes with mild-to-moderate POAG was not inferior to that of monofocal IOLs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Research (identifier: jRCTs032200218).

Utility of budgerigar/pigeon/parrot-specific IgG antibody with ImmunoCAP® in bird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis caused by other bird species and duvet.

BACKGROUND: Bird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis (BRHP) is an extrinsic allergic alveolitis caused by inhalation of bird antigens. Although the measurement of serum-specific IgG antibodies against budgerigar, pigeon, and parrot with ImmunoCAP® is available in Japan, the utility of the test for patients with causes by bird breeding other than these three species, including contact with wild birds/poultry/bird manure, and use of a duvet is unknown. METHODS: Of the 75 BRHP patients who participated in our previous study, 30 were included. Six cases were caused by bird breeding of species other than pigeon, budgerigar, and parrot, seven were in contact with wild birds/poultry/bird manure, and 17 were using a duvet. Bird-specific IgG antibodies were compared among the patients, 64 controls, and 147 healthy participants. RESULTS: In patients with BRHP caused by bird breeding, budgerigar and parrot-specific IgG levels were significantly higher than in disease controls. Only parrot-specific IgG was significantly higher than in disease controls in patients caused by duvet use. However, among patients with acute episodes (acute and recurrent type of chronic BRHP), IgG antibodies against all three species were significantly higher than those of disease controls caused by bird breeding and the use of a duvet. CONCLUSIONS: Bird-specific IgG antibody with ImmunoCAP® was useful for screening and diagnosing BRHP caused by other bird species and duvets.

Visual function in eyes with diffractive extended depth-of-focus and monofocal intraocular lenses: 2-year comparison.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term visual function after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using echelett optics and monofocal IOLs with the same platform. METHODS: In this prospective comparative case series, diffractive EDF or monofocal IOLs were implanted binocularly and followed up for 2 years. At the last visit, distance-corrected binocular visual acuities were measured at distances of 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, and 5 m. Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity was also examined. Dynamic visual function was evaluated in terms of functional visual acuity (FVA), standard deviation of visual acuity (SDVA), visual maintenance ratio (VMR), mean response time, and number of blinks. The outcomes were compared between the two IOLs, and the influence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) on contrast sensitivity and FVA was examined. RESULTS: Binocular visual acuity of eyes with EDF IOLs was better at distances of 0.5 and 0.7 m than that of eyes with monofocal IOL (P < 0.026). There were no differences in binocular visual acuity at other distances, contrast sensitivities, or dynamic visual functions. The influence of PCO on the visual functions was not found in eyes with EDF IOLs. CONCLUSION: Up to 2 years postoperatively, eyes with diffractive EDF IOLs sustained superior intermediate visual acuity together with visual function comparable to that of eyes with monofocal IOLs.

Temperature-controlled porcine eye holder for observing intraocular temperature during cataract surgery.

During cataract surgery, the intraocular temperature changes when irrigating low-temperature fluid and ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) are inserted in the anterior chamber, and such a temperature variation affects the unfolding of the intraocular lens (IOL). A porcine eye holder was developed for simulating temperature conditions in clinical surgery by maintaining the ocular temperature close to the body temperature. An aluminum holder was designed to fit porcine eyes and maintain the ocular temperature at approximately 36 °C, while surgery was performed at a room temperature of 20 °C. Intraocular temperature was monitored using a thermocouple sensor placed close to the posterior capsule in the vitreous cavity. Temperatures and microscopic image of the anterior chamber were simultaneously recorded. With the use of the eye holder system, the intraocular temperature unstable during surgery was observed, and there were significant reductions during hydrodissection, irrigation and aspiration, OVD insertion in the capsule, and OVD removal after IOL implantation.

Implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in normal tension glaucoma eyes: A case series.

Purpose: Implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) has not been advised for glaucomatous eyes because of the risk of decreased contrast sensitivity with progress of glaucoma. Extended depth-of-focus (EDF) IOLs have been reported to provide comparable postoperative visual function and influence on the visual field to monofocal IOLs. Methods: This case series was a retrospective medical record review of 16 eyes of 10 patients who had normal tension glaucoma (NTG) with no central visual field defects and underwent cataract surgery with implantation of diffractive EDF IOLs. At 3 months postoperatively, distance-corrected visual acuities (DCVAs) at distances of 5, 1, and 0.5 m and photopic contrast sensitivity were examined. Automated perimetry using the 30-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm was also performed, and the mean variance (MD) values, mean deviation values at the central four points (central MD), and foveal threshold were recorded. Results: The mean age of the patients (5 men, 5 women) was 66.5 years. Over 80% of eyes obtained DCVAs of 20/20, 20/20, and 20/25 at 5 m, 1 m, and 0.5 m, respectively. Whereas 5 of 16 eyes were categorized as severe by the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson classification, postoperative contrast sensitivity was within the normal range, except for 4 eyes at 18 cycles per degree. Conclusions and importance: In this case series, the postoperative visual functions of NTG patients with EDF IOLs were almost comparable to those of normal eyes with the same IOLs, which demonstrated that the use of EDF IOLs for controlled NTG eyes would be permissible. While careful patient selection and follow-up for NTG progress are important, further investigations are necessary for confirming the safety and exploring the selection criteria.

Influence of implantation of diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses on standard automated perimetry.

BACKGROUND: This prospective comparative study aimed to investigate the influence of diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implantation on standard automated perimetry. METHODS: Patients with no diseases affecting the visual field had undergone cataract surgery following the implantation of trifocal or monofocal IOLs from July 2019 to August 2020 were recruited. The normality of the anterior and posterior segments and absence of glaucomatous optic nerve cupping were confirmed preoperatively by slit-lamp examination. Standard automated perimetry was performed using Humphrey Visual Field 10-2 testing, 2-3 months after cataract surgery in only one eye per patient. The mean deviation (MD) and foveal sensitivity were compared between IOLs in eyes with acceptable reliability indices and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better. RESULTS: Among the 83 eyes of the 83 patients included, 39 and 29 eyes eligible for perimetry analysis had trifocal and monofocal IOLs, respectively. The mean MD and foveal sensitivity in eyes with trifocal IOLs were significantly lower than those in eyes with monofocal IOLs (P < 0.021), with mean differences of 0.77 and 1.01 dB, respectively. CONCLUSION: The comparison in nonglaucomatous eyes demonstrated that the influence of trifocal IOLs on standard automated perimetry was greater than that of monofocal IOLs.

Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics.

BACKGROUND: The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate all-distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and functional visual acuity (FVA) of eyes with diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using an echelett optics and monofocal IOLs with the same platform. METHODS: Diffractive EDOF and monofocal IOLs were implanted in 27 eyes of 27 patients each. At 3 months after implantation, all-distance visual acuities at distances of 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1, 2, 3, and 5 m were measured under distance-corrected. Static visual function was also examined using photopic contrast sensitivity and area under the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). Dynamic visual function was examined with FVA, and mean FVA value, visual maintenance ratio (VMR), mean response time, and number of blinks were evaluated. These outcomes were compared between the two IOLs. RESULTS: The mean distance-corrected visual acuities were better at distances of 0.7 m or nearer in eyes with EDOF IOLs. There was no difference in the contrast sensitivities (P > 0.22). In the FVA results, no difference was found in mean FVA and VMR (P > 0.68). CONCLUSION: The static and dynamic evaluations of postoperative visual functions demonstrated that the visual function of eyes with EDOF IOLs under photopic and distance-corrected conditions was comparable to eyes with monofocal IOLs.

Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group.

BACKGROUND: To examine the effectiveness of the use of machine learning for adapting an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for a patient group. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the clinical records of 1,611 eyes of 1,169 Japanese patients who received a single model of monofocal IOL (SN60WF, Alcon) at Miyata Eye Hospital were reviewed and analyzed. Using biometric metrics and postoperative refractions of 1211 eyes of 769 patients, constants of the SRK/T and Haigis formulas were optimized. The SRK/T formula was adapted using a support vector regressor. Prediction errors in the use of adapted formulas as well as the SRK/T, Haigis, Hill-RBF and Barrett Universal II formulas were evaluated with data from 395 eyes of 395 distinct patients. Mean prediction errors, median absolute errors, and percentages of eyes within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D, and over + 0.50 D of errors were compared among formulas. RESULTS: The mean prediction errors in the use of the SRT/K and adapted formulas were smaller than the use of other formulas (P < 0.001). In the absolute errors, the Hill-RBF and adapted methods were better than others. The performance of the Barrett Universal II was not better than the others for the patient group. There were the least eyes with hyperopic refractive errors (16.5%) in the use of the adapted formula. CONCLUSIONS: Adapting IOL power calculations using machine learning technology with data from a particular patient group was effective and promising.

Surface light scattering from 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with hydroxyethyl methacrylate: contralateral observation for 7 years.

PURPOSE: To quantitatively and intraindividually compare surface light scattering for 7 years after implantation of Clareon and AcrySof intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING: Miyata Eye Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative case series. METHODS: Clinical records of eyes that had contralateral implantation of SN60WF and SY60WF IOLs were reviewed. Light scattering on the anterior surface of IOLs, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and mesopic and photopic contrast sensitivities were examined at 1 year, 3 years, and 7 years postoperatively, and they were intraindividually compared. RESULTS: 34, 19, and 16 patients visited at 1 year, 3 years, and 7 years postoperatively, respectively. Surface light scattering in eyes with SY60WF IOL was significantly reduced, and the rate of increase was 2.74 computer compatible tapes per year. Although there were prominent increases in eyes with SN60WF IOL, no statistically significant difference was found in their CDVA and contrast sensitivities. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with Clareon IOLs, the development of surface light scattering was suppressed up to 7 years. The increase rate demonstrated that the visual acuity would be least deteriorated up to 12 years postoperatively, whereas the influence of straylight induced should be investigated.

Subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using echelette optics: clinical and experimental study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) using echelette optics, and the effect of the light wavelength used during examinations. METHODS: In the prospective study, subjective and objective refractions of 128 eyes of 64 patients were examined 3 months after implantation of the EDOF IOLs (ZXR00V, Johnson & Johnson Surgival Vision). Objective refractions were measured using an autorefractor with a near-infrared (NIR) light source. Clinical differences in the spherical, cylindrical and spherical equivalent (SE) refractions between the subjective and objective refractions were evaluated. Then, lens powers of monofocal, EDOF and diffractive bifocal IOLs in the use of a 850-nm light source were measured experimentally for using a lensmeter, and the differences from the monofocal IOLs were calculated. RESULTS: The mean objective refractions were more myopic (p < 0.001) than the subjective refractions; the differences in the spherical, cylindrical and SE refractions were -0.71, -0.26 and -0.84 dioptre, respectively. Experimental investigation resulted that there was the mean difference of 0.83 D with the EDOF from monofocal IOLs at 850 nm, while the difference was -0.20 D with bifocal IOLs. CONCLUSIONS: The diffractive EDOF IOLs using echelette gratings inherently induced constant differences in the subjective and objective refractions, which arose from the chromatic difference in IOL powers for the visible and NIR lights.

Efficacy of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy: Experimental Evaluation Using the Zonular Dehiscence Model.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate experimentally the efficacy of femtosecond laser (FL)-assisted capsulotomy using an eye model with different degrees of zonular dehiscence (ZD). Methods: An eye model with ZD was created by removing the total iris and including the planned range of the ZD in porcine and human cadaver eyes. FL-assisted capsulotomies (laser group) and manual capsulotomies (manual group) were created for the eye model with 0, 45, 135, 180, and 270 degrees of ZD. The continuity, mean diameter, ellipticity, and decentration of the capsulotomy were evaluated using the captured images. The same evaluation of FL-assisted capsulotomies was done for five human cadaver eyes with 180 degrees of ZD. Results: In the laser group, no differences were seen in the mean diameter, ellipticity, and decentration, although the manual group resulted in significantly larger, ovalized, and decentered capsulotomies with different degrees of ZD (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.0317, respectively). Continuous capsulotomies or capsulotomies with microadhesions were obtained up to 180 degrees of ZD, and incomplete treatment areas were seen in eyes with 270 degrees of ZD. Capsulotomy of the human cadaver eyes with 180 degrees of ZD showed similar results to those of porcine eyes. Conclusions: In this experimental study, FL-assisted capsulotomy showed favorable results in eyes with between 0 and 180 degrees of ZD compared to conventional manual capsulotomy. Translational Relevance: Our experimental model can simulate the capsulotomy in cases with ZD, the results are useful when determining the indication for FL-assisted capsulotomies.

Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry.

This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) on standard automated perimetry. Ninety eyes of 90 patients who had undergone cataract surgery from February 2018 to December 2018 were included. No patients had any diseases that might affect the visual field. ZMB00 (+ 4.00 D add), ZXR00V (+ 1.75 D add), and ZCB00V (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA) were used as multifocal, EDOF, and monofocal IOLs, respectively. Humphrey Visual Field 10-2 testing was performed 2-3 months after cataract surgery, acceptable reliability indices were measured, and mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), foveal sensitivity and mean sensitivity (MS) were compared. Seventy-one eyes (ZXR00V: 24 eyes, ZMB00: 25 eyes, ZCB00V: 22 eyes) were used for the analyses. The MD and MS of the EDOF and monofocal groups were significantly higher than those of the multifocal group (P < 0.0051). However, the MD and MS of the EDOF and monofocal groups were not different (P > 0.23). The PSD and foveal sensitivity were not different among the groups. In non-glaucomatous patients, the MD and MS of the EDOF IOL were comparable to those of the monofocal IOL and better than those of the multifocal IOL.

Short-term Interim Results of Clinical Outcomes and Complications After Implantation of Boston Keratoprosthesis in Japanese Patients.

Keratoprosthesis is used for corneal transplantation in high-risk patients who require penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Boston keratoprosthesis (BKpro) is a representative type of keratoprosthesis used worldwide. In Japan, the first BKpro was implanted in an eye after multiple corneal graft failures in 2008, but its use remains limited. A recent patient survey revealed that among the Japanese patients who had previously undergone multiple PKPs, the retention rate of BKpro was significantly higher than that of PKP at 5 years postoperatively (100% vs. 26%; P < 0.01). Patients with implanted BKpro also had better best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or higher than those with PKP at 5 years postoperatively (80.0% vs. 17.6%; P = 0.03). Regarding the postoperative complications, retroprosthetic membrane formation was observed in 88.9%, infectious keratitis in 33.3%, and glaucoma progression in 11.1% of cases. Another retrospective analysis showed that fungal keratitis occurred in 0.09 patients per year and severely affected visual acuity. Furthermore, because it is difficult to accurately examine intraocular pressure after BKpro implantation, the intraocular pressure of patients with implanted BKpro was prospectively estimated using a transpalpebral tonometer (Diaton). In conclusion, BKpro implantation is effective and safe for Japanese patients, given the reported improvements in visual acuity and low rates of complications.

Binocular visual function after staged implantation of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter: A prospective comparison.

The prospective comparative case series aimed to evaluate the binocular uncorrected visual acuities (BUCVAs) after staged implantations of extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) targeting emmetropia and -0.5 diopter (D). Diffractive EDOF IOLs with an add power of +1.75 D were implanted in the first eyes targeting emmetropia or -0.5 D according to the patients' preferences, then the targets for the second eyes were determined 1 week or longer after the implantation. IOL powers were determined with the SRK/T formula. Consequently, the subjects were divided into 3 groups: those with emmetropia targeted bilaterally (group EE, 22 patients), those with -0.5 D targeted bilaterally (group MM, 21 patients), and those with monovision of emmetropia and -0.5 D (group EM, 21 patients). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), BUCVA from 0.3 to 5 meters, spectacle use, and questionnaire regarding photic symptoms and patient satisfaction were assessed 3 months postoperatively. No significant differences were seen in the mean BUCVAs at any distance (P > 0.23), spectacle use (P = 0.13), or photic symptoms and patient satisfaction (P>0.65). When the EE and MM groups were assigned based on the MRSE, the EE group was better at 5 m (P = 0.005) while the MM group at 0.5 m (P = 0.031). The effect of different targeted refractions was not identified due to insufficient accuracy in the use of the SRK/T power calculation.

Presbyopia Correction Using Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses in Patients With Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of presbyopia correction using multifocal soft contact lenses (MF SCLs) for pseudophakic subjects with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: In 11 subjects, after monofocal IOL implantation, disposable MF SCLs (Dailies Total 1 Multifocal, Alcon) were daily used for 3 months. Binocular visual acuity between 0.3 and 5 m was measured using an all-distance vision tester (AS-15, Kowa) at 1 and 3 months and compared before and during MF SCL wear. Binocular contrast sensitivity testing was conducted under mesopic and photopic illuminations at 1 month. RESULTS: The mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent before MF SCL wear was -0.36 D. The add powers of used MF SCLs were +1.25, +2.00, and +2.50 D in 1, 16, and 5 eyes, respectively. The mean binocular visual acuities during MF SCL wear were 20/20 or better between 0.5 and 5 m and significantly improved at 0.7 m or less (P<0.025). There was no change in the mesopic contrast sensitivity, whereas the photopic contrast sensitivity at 18 cycles per degree was degraded during MF SCL wear. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MF SCL was effective for presbyopia correction in pseudophakic subjects with monofocal IOL, and favorable binocular vision would be obtained in a range from distance to intermediate.

Effect of the ratio of axial length to keratometry on SRK/T intraocular lens power calculations for eyes with long axial lengths.

This retrospective study explored the effect of the ratio of axial length (AL) to average keratometry (K) on intraocular lens power calculation in long eyes. The clinical records of eyes that had an AL of 26.0 mm or longer, and underwent cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantations, were reviewed. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Miyata Eye Hospital. Preoperative biometry data were obtained using optical low-coherence reflectometry. Prediction errors in the use of the SRK/T formulas were obtained from manifest refraction spherical equivalents one month postoperatively. Significant factors inducing prediction errors were examined using stepwise multiple regression analysis with descriptive factors of AL, K value, and their ratio (AL/K). Clinical records related to 49 long eyes of 49 patients, and 93 eyes of 93 patients with normal AL, were evaluated. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the AL/K was a significant factor increasing the prediction errors (P = 0.0003). With the regression equation, 98% of prediction errors with the use of the SRK/T formula were within ±1.00 D of differences. For our sample of 49 long eyes, the ratio of AL to K was a significant factor inducing hyperopic prediction errors with the use of SRK/T for long eyes.

Central and Peripheral Corneal Endothelial Cell Analysis With Slit-Scanning Wide-Field Contact Specular Microscopy: Agreement With Noncontact Specular Microscopy.

PURPOSE: The prospective case series aimed to examine the agreement between the use of a slit-scanning contact specular microscope and a noncontact specular microscope in corneal endothelial cell (CEC) analysis and to evaluate the differences between the central and peripheral regions in normal corneas. METHODS: After confirming normal corneal endothelium with slit-lamp microscopy, CEC images of 56 eyes of 56 cataractous patients were analyzed in the central and 4 peripheral regions using a slit-scanning contact specular microscope. A noncontact specular microscope was used for the analysis in the central region. The endothelial cell density (ECD), the percentage of hexagonal shape cells (HEX), and the coefficient of variation (CV) in the central region were compared. Differences between central and peripheral CECs were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean ECD was 2778 cell/mm and was not different from the results using the noncontact specular microscope (2736 cell/mm, P = 0.051). There was a significant correlation (P < 0.001, R = 0.72). The analysis of HEX resulted in larger values with the slit-scanning contact microscope (53.13% vs. 48.89%, P < 0.001), whereas there was no difference in the CV (38.48 vs. 38.04, P = 0.56). On comparing the central and peripheral regions, there was no significant difference in the ECD, whereas significant differences were found in the superior region in the HEX and CV (P < 0.001) and in the nasal region in CV (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of ECD with the use of the slit-scanning contact specular microscope did not differ from the noncontact specular microscope, and the results demonstrated no difference between the central and peripheral ECD.

Binocular Visual Function With Staged Implantation of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses With Three Add Powers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the binocular visual function and depth of focus after staged implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) with 3 different add powers following cataract removal. DESIGN: Prospective comparative case series. METHODS: Setting: Institutional. STUDY POPULATION: Both eyes of 56 patients that underwent staged implantation of bifocal IOLs. INTERVENTION: In the first eye, MIOLs with a +4.0-diopter (D) add power were implanted. Based on outcomes at 1 week postoperatively and patient preference for near vision, 1 of 3 near add powers-+4.0 D (group MM), +3.25 D (group ML), or +2.75 D (group MK)-was implanted in the fellow eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Three months postoperatively, the binocular uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuities (BUCVA and BDCVA, respectively) at 5.0, 1.0, 0.5, 0.4, and 0.3 meters; binocular defocus curves; contrast sensitivity; and near stereopsis were measured. RESULTS: The MM, ML, and MK groups included 21, 18, and 17 patients, respectively. The mean BUCVA in the MM group was significantly (P = .003) worse than that in the MK group at 0.5 meter. The BDCVAs at 0.5 meter in the ML and MK groups were significantly (P < .02) better than that in the MM group. The defocus curves with the -2.0 D refraction differed significantly (P < .001) between the MM and MK groups. The binocular contrast sensitivity and stereopsis values did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Staged implantation of different add powers obtained better binocular intermediate visual acuity without degradation of visual function.